← Case library
4th DCAJune 24, 2026Reversed and Remanded⭐ Notable

Zambezi Ann, LLC v. Susan D. Deppert

Case No. 2025-2406

The Fourth DCA reversed an order granting judgment on the pleadings because the pleadings were not closed, as required by Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.140(c). The court remanded for further proceedings and cautioned the parties to comply with the requirements and safeguards of the section 56.29 proceedings supplementary statute.

Key facts

  • The parties executed a residential sales contract for a home in St. Lucie County; after a dispute, Deppert successfully sued for specific performance, obtaining transfer of the home plus supplemental damages and attorney fees.
  • Deppert initiated proceedings supplementary under section 56.29, Florida Statutes, alleging fraudulent transfer of assets to avoid collection.
  • +1 more key fact with a free trial

Holdings

  • A motion for judgment on the pleadings under Rule 1.140(c) may be granted only after the pleadings are closed; entry of judgment on the pleadings before the pleadings close is reversible…

Why it matters

The opinion is a procedural reminder that judgment on the pleadings is unavailable until the pleadings are closed, and it flags the distinct procedural requirements and safeguards of section 56.29 proceedings… — full analysis with a trial

Best value · free

Read the full opinion, holdings & search — free for 30 days

The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision — in your hands.

  • Search every tracked Florida decision in seconds
  • Save, tag & file the cases that matter into your own library
  • Read the full plain-English analysis and holdings
Start my free 30-day trial → No credit card required
👀 Take a quick tour of the site → 60 seconds · click a real case · no login

Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.

Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.