← Case library
3rd DCAMay 18, 2022Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with instructions⭐ Notable

Wilmington Trust, N.A. v. Serpa

Case No. 21-1835

At a foreclosure trial, the borrowers moved for involuntary dismissal under section 201.08(1)(b), Florida Statutes, because documentary stamp taxes had not been paid on the loan modification; the trial court denied a continuance, dismissed, and entered final judgment for the borrowers. The Third District affirmed the discretionary dismissal of the unstamped instrument but held the trial court erred in refusing to let the lender proceed on the original mortgage (on which taxes were undisputedly paid), that any dismissal should have been without prejudice, and that it abused its discretion on rehearing in refusing to reopen the evidence after the lender timely paid the taxes and filed proof.

Key facts

  • Wilmington Trust, N.A., a lender, brought a foreclosure action against borrowers Serpa on a mortgage and a later loan modification.
  • At trial, borrowers moved for involuntary dismissal under Florida Statutes section 201.08(1)(b) because documentary stamp taxes had not been paid on the loan modification; the trial court denied lender's request for a continuance, granted the dismissal, and entered final judgment for borrowers.
  • +2 more key facts with a free trial

Why it matters

Practical guidance for lenders and note-holders ambushed at trial by a section 201.08 documentary stamp tax objection: the dismissal must be without prejudice, the unstamped defect does not bar enforcement of portions… — full analysis with a trial

🔒 Read the full opinion, holding & search the library

The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision are available to members. Start a free 30-day trial — no credit card.

Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.

Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.