← Case library
2nd DCAOctober 7, 2026Appeal Dismissed with Sanctions (Pro Se Filing Bar)⭐ Notable

Washington v. Justice

Case No. 2D2025-2678

Pro se appellants filed an initial brief citing eleven nonexistent cases and, after an order to show cause, offered only excuses ("scrivener's errors") and argued the newly amended Fla. R. Gen. Prac. & Jud. Admin. 2.515(d)(2)(D) could not be applied retroactively. The Second District held that no retroactive application was needed because the pre-amendment version of rule 2.515(d)(2), combined with Fla. R. App. P. 9.410(a), already authorized sanctions for signing a filing containing fictitious citations. The court dismissed the appeal and directed the clerk to place in an inactive file any future filings by the appellants related to the underlying circuit court case unless signed by a Florida Bar member.

Key facts

  • Pro se appellants filed an initial brief in an appeal citing eleven nonexistent cases, then offered excuses of 'scrivener's errors' when ordered to show cause.
  • The appellants argued that any sanctions could not apply because the amended Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.515(d)(2)(D) could not be applied retroactively to their pre-amendment filing.
  • +2 more key facts with a free trial

Why it matters

This decision forecloses the argument—likely to be raised by litigants and counsel caught with AI-hallucinated citations in pre-amendment filings—that sanctions require retroactive application of amended rule… — full analysis with a trial

🔒 Read the full opinion, holding & search the library

The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision are available to members. Start a free 30-day trial — no credit card.

Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.

Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.