← Case library
11th Cir.August 17, 2026Affirmed in Part, Reversed in Part and Remanded🔬 Novel Issue

Warner v. Hillsborough County Clerk of Courts

Case No. 24-10748

A tenant deposited $3,600 of rent into the Hillsborough County court registry under Fla. Stat. § 83.60 during an eviction case; after the case was dismissed, the Clerk mailed notice to an address that had already generated 13 return-to-sender notices and published notice in a primarily Spanish-language newspaper reaching under 0.2% of the county, then forfeited the funds to the county's fine and forfeiture fund under Fla. Stat. § 116.21. The Eleventh Circuit held § 116.21 is not facially invalid, but that the Clerk's application of it violated procedural due process because neither the letter nor the publication was reasonably calculated to reach Warner when his e-mail, phone, and a good mailing address were available in the state e-filing system, and that the resulting forfeiture was an uncompensated taking because abandonment could not be inferred from a failure to respond to constitutionally deficient notice. Judge Luck dissented as to the takings holding, reading Texaco v. Short to permit escheat of property abandoned by nonuse.

Key facts

  • Tenant Warner deposited $3,600 of rent into Hillsborough County court registry during an eviction case under Florida Statute § 83.60; after the case was dismissed, the Clerk mailed notice to an address that had generated 13 prior return-to-sender notices and published notice in a primarily Spanish-language newspaper.
  • The Clerk forfeited the unclaimed registry funds to the county's fine and forfeiture fund under Fla. Stat. § 116.21 without obtaining individualized notice reasonably calculated to reach Warner, despite having access to his valid e-mail address, phone number, and good mailing address in the state e-filing system.
  • +1 more key fact with a free trial

Why it matters

This is the first published Eleventh Circuit treatment of Fla. Stat. § 116.21, and it substantially limits how Florida clerks may sweep court registry and other unclaimed funds into county fine and forfeiture funds… — full analysis with a trial

Best value · free

Read the full opinion, holdings & search — free for 30 days

The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision — in your hands.

  • Search every tracked Florida decision in seconds
  • Save, tag & file the cases that matter into your own library
  • Read the full plain-English analysis and holdings
Start my free 30-day trial → No credit card required
👀 Take a quick tour of the site → 60 seconds · click a real case · no login

Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.

Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.