Warner v. Hillsborough County Clerk of Courts

A tenant deposited $3,600 of rent into the Hillsborough County court registry under Fla. Stat. § 83.60 during an eviction case; after the case was dismissed, the Clerk mailed notice to an address that had already generated 13 return-to-sender notices and published notice in a primarily Spanish-language newspaper reaching under 0.2% of the county, then forfeited the funds to the county's fine and forfeiture fund under Fla. Stat. § 116.21. The Eleventh Circuit held § 116.21 is not facially invalid, but that the Clerk's application of it violated procedural due process because neither the letter nor the publication was reasonably calculated to reach Warner when his e-mail, phone, and a good mailing address were available in the state e-filing system, and that the resulting forfeiture was an uncompensated taking because abandonment could not be inferred from a failure to respond to constitutionally deficient notice. Judge Luck dissented as to the takings holding, reading Texaco v. Short to permit escheat of property abandoned by nonuse.

Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.