← Case library
3rd DCAOctober 2, 2019Petition for Writ of Certiorari Denied⭐ Notable

Villalobos v. Martinez

Case No. 19-0155

In a personal-injury discovery dispute, the Third DCA denied certiorari review of an order addressing disclosure of the financial relationship between a non-party law firm/insurer and retained experts, citing Worley v. Central Florida YMCA and its own recent decision in Angeles-Delgado v. Benitez. The court expressly noted contrary authority from the Fourth and Fifth DCAs, which have certified questions of great public importance on whether Worley extends to defense firms and insurers, with review pending in the Florida Supreme Court.

Key facts

  • Villalobos sought discovery regarding the financial relationship between a non-party law firm/insurer and retained experts in a personal-injury case.
  • The trial court entered an order addressing disclosure of the financial relationship, and Villalobos petitioned for certiorari review in the Third District Court of Appeal.
  • +2 more key facts with a free trial

Why it matters

This opinion places the Third DCA on the plaintiff-friendly side of the developing Worley expert-bias discovery split, signaling that in Miami-Dade cases the court will not grant certiorari to compel disclosure of a… — full analysis with a trial

Best value · free

Read the full opinion, holdings & search — free for 30 days

The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision — in your hands.

  • Search every tracked Florida decision in seconds
  • Save, tag & file the cases that matter into your own library
  • Read the full plain-English analysis and holdings
Start my free 30-day trial → No credit card required
👀 Take a quick tour of the site → 60 seconds · click a real case · no login

Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.

Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.