← Case library
4th DCAApril 16, 2025Reversed

Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Company v. Thomas J. Yager and Deborah Jo Yager

Case No. 4D2023-2310

The Fourth District reversed a trial court's partial summary judgment that had barred an insurer from presenting a "prompt notice" affirmative defense. The court held that the insureds failed to specifically plead waiver in a timely reply as required by Florida Rules of Civil Procedure 1.100(a) and 1.110(d), and that an insurer's partial payment for some claimed damages does not, as a matter of law, waive the right to assert a prompt notice defense to the full claim.

Key facts

  • Insureds held a homeowners policy with Universal for August 2019 to August 2020; they reported a roof/water leak loss in August 2020, but Universal alleged the underlying loss actually occurred in May 2020.
  • Universal paid approximately $2,000 for interior water damage but denied roof coverage, and asserted a 'prompt notice' affirmative defense.
  • +2 more key facts with a free trial

Holdings

  • Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.100(a) requires a reply containing the avoidance when a party seeks to avoid an affirmative defense; Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.110(d) requires waiver to be specifically pleaded…
  • +2 more holdings with a free trial
Best value · free

Read the full opinion, holdings & search — free for 30 days

The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision — in your hands.

  • Search every tracked Florida decision in seconds
  • Save, tag & file the cases that matter into your own library
  • Read the full plain-English analysis and holdings
Start my free 30-day trial → No credit card required
👀 Take a quick tour of the site → 60 seconds · click a real case · no login

Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.

Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.