← Case library
3rd DCAJanuary 20, 2021Reversed and Remanded⭐ Notable

Universal Property & Casualty Ins. Co. v. Horne

Case No. 19-1550

Universal denied further payment on a homeowner's water-loss claim and pled the insured's failure to submit a sworn proof of loss within 60 days as an affirmative defense. The trial court found waiver by payment, substantial compliance, and no prejudice, denied Universal's summary judgment motion, and granted the insured summary judgment on the affirmative defenses, barring the defense at trial. The Third DCA reversed, holding that issuing payment and investigating a claim does not waive the sworn proof of loss requirement, and remanding for the parties to litigate under the burden-shifting framework of American Integrity Ins. Co. v. Estrada.

Key facts

  • Universal Property & Casualty Insurance denied further payment on the insured's homeowner's water-loss claim and asserted the insured's failure to submit a sworn proof of loss within 60 days as an affirmative defense.
  • The trial court found waiver by payment, substantial compliance, and no prejudice, then granted summary judgment for the insured barring the affirmative defense at trial.
  • +1 more key fact with a free trial

Why it matters

This decision reinforces the Third DCA's Estrada burden-shifting framework for post-loss obligation defenses in first-party property cases and confirms that an insurer does not waive the sworn proof of loss condition… — full analysis with a trial

🔒 Read the full opinion, holding & search the library

The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision are available to members. Start a free 30-day trial — no credit card.

Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.

Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.