← Case library
3rd DCAJuly 21, 2021Reversed and Remanded⭐ Notable

United Automobile Insurance Company v. Progressive Rehabilitation and Orthopedic Services, LLC, a/a/o Yasel Alonso

Case No. 21-0108

In a PIP suit over the reasonableness of medical charges, the county court granted summary judgment for the provider after finding the insurer's adjuster affidavit purely speculative. The Third DCA reversed, holding the adjuster's affidavit rested on a discernible, factually based chain of reasoning a her experience, education, review of the claims file and charges, fee schedules, and the statutory factors in section 627.736(5)(a) a and thus created a genuine issue of material fact. The court also clarified that the Daubert standard codified in section 90.702 does not categorically bar experience-based expert opinion.

Key facts

  • United Automobile Insurance Company sought to challenge the reasonableness of medical charges billed by Progressive Rehabilitation and Orthopedic Services, LLC in a personal injury protection (PIP) insurance dispute involving patient Yasel Alonso.
  • The county court granted summary judgment in favor of the medical provider, finding that the insurer's adjuster affidavit was purely speculative and lacked evidentiary support.
  • +2 more key facts with a free trial

Why it matters

The opinion is useful ammunition for insurers (and any party) defending the sufficiency of a claims-adjuster or experience-based expert affidavit against a 'purely speculative' attack, and it gives a workable… — full analysis with a trial

🔒 Read the full opinion, holding & search the library

The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision are available to members. Start a free 30-day trial — no credit card.

Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.

Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.