Tundidor v. State
A death-row petitioner moved to disqualify the judge presiding over his postconviction proceedings after she hugged the prosecutor assigned to his case (while robed, in the courtroom) at the conclusion of the high-profile Nikolas Cruz sentencing, and then two days later 'commiserated' with that same prosecutor at a hearing in petitioner's case. The trial judge denied the motion as legally insufficient. The Florida Supreme Court, treating the petition as one for prohibition, held the combination of alleged facts would create in a reasonably prudent person a well-founded fear of not receiving a fair and impartial proceeding, quashed the denial, and directed reassignment.
Key facts
- Death-row petitioner filed a motion to disqualify the trial judge presiding over his postconviction proceedings after alleging the judge hugged the prosecutor assigned to his case while robed in the courtroom following a high-profile sentencing, then commiserated with that same prosecutor at a hearing in his case two days later.
- The trial judge denied the motion to disqualify as legally insufficient.
- +2 more key facts with a free trial
Why it matters
Although arising in a capital postconviction posture, the decision applies Rule 2.330 and the objective 'reasonably prudent person' standard that governs disqualification in civil cases as well. It is a useful Supreme… — full analysis with a trial
Read the full opinion, holdings & search — free for 30 days
The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision — in your hands.
- Search every tracked Florida decision in seconds
- Save, tag & file the cases that matter into your own library
- Read the full plain-English analysis and holdings
Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.
Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.