← Case library
FL Supreme CourtSeptember 11, 2025Dismissed

Teresa Gaffney v. Phillip A. Baumann, etc., et al.

Case No. SC2024-1862

The Florida Supreme Court imposed a pro se filing bar on Teresa Gaffney after she filed her fifth meritless petition for review arising from the same Hillsborough County estate-related circuit court cases. The Court ordered its Clerk to reject any future pro se filings by Gaffney related to those two cases unless signed by a Florida Bar member in good standing who certifies the proceeding may have merit and can be brought in good faith. The ruling also followed a previously granted $2,500 attorney's fees sanction against Gaffney in favor of respondent's counsel.

Key facts

  • Teresa Gaffney filed her fifth petition for review in the Florida Supreme Court related to Hillsborough County circuit court cases concerning estate administration following the death of her husband.
  • The Court had previously denied review four times in related cases: SC2019-0893, SC2019-0899, SC2021-1212, and SC2024-1474.
  • +2 more key facts with a free trial

Holdings

  • The Florida Supreme Court may bar a pro se litigant from filing any future pleadings, petitions, motions, or documents related to specified trial court cases unless signed by a Florida Bar…
  • +2 more holdings with a free trial
Best value · free

Read the full opinion, holdings & search — free for 30 days

The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision — in your hands.

  • Search every tracked Florida decision in seconds
  • Save, tag & file the cases that matter into your own library
  • Read the full plain-English analysis and holdings
Start my free 30-day trial → No credit card required
👀 Take a quick tour of the site → 60 seconds · click a real case · no login

Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.

Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.