← Case library
6th DCAJanuary 8, 2024Reversed and Remanded; Conflict Certified⚡ Circuit Split Resolved

Sulzer v. American Integrity Insurance Co. of Florida

Case No. 6D2023-0391

The Sixth DCA, following its decision in Hughes v. Universal Property & Casualty, held that section 627.70152's pre-suit notice requirement does not apply retroactively to insureds whose policies and losses predated the statute's 2021 enactment, and reversed the dismissal of the insureds' breach-of-policy suit. The court again certified direct conflict with the Fourth DCA's decision in Cole v. Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Co.

Key facts

  • Insureds with homeowner policies issued and losses occurring before July 1, 2021 sued American Integrity Insurance for breach of policy.
  • The trial court dismissed the lawsuit for failure to comply with section 627.70152's pre-suit notice requirement, which became effective in 2021.
  • +2 more key facts with a free trial

Why it matters

This decision deepens an existing and certified district conflict over whether the 2021 property-insurance pre-suit notice statute applies to pre-enactment policies and losses, an issue affecting a large volume of… — full analysis with a trial

Best value · free

Read the full opinion, holdings & search — free for 30 days

The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision — in your hands.

  • Search every tracked Florida decision in seconds
  • Save, tag & file the cases that matter into your own library
  • Read the full plain-English analysis and holdings
Start my free 30-day trial → No credit card required
👀 Take a quick tour of the site → 60 seconds · click a real case · no login

Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.

Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.