← Case library
4th DCAAugust 17, 2022Reversed and remanded⭐ Notable

State v. Tillman

Case No. 4D2021-2423

The State appealed orders dismissing misdemeanor charges under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.213(a)(1) after the defendant failed to appear at three status conferences meant to assess her continuing incompetency. The Fourth DCA reversed, holding that the defendant's repeated non-appearance prevented the trial court from making the required finding of continuing incompetency and thwarted the State's ability to seek a reevaluation, so dismissal was improper without such a finding.

Key facts

  • The State appealed the trial court's dismissal of misdemeanor charges against Tillman under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.213(a)(1) after Tillman failed to appear at three status conferences scheduled to assess her continuing incompetency.
  • Tillman's defense counsel made an unsworn statement that Tillman had suffered a stroke, but provided no sworn testimony or stipulation to establish continued incompetency.
  • +1 more key fact with a free trial

Why it matters

This decision reinforces and extends Nerette v. State, clarifying that a misdemeanor defendant's evasive non-appearance at status conferences defeats automatic dismissal under rule 3.213(a)(1) because it prevents the… — full analysis with a trial

Best value · free

Read the full opinion, holdings & search — free for 30 days

The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision — in your hands.

  • Search every tracked Florida decision in seconds
  • Save, tag & file the cases that matter into your own library
  • Read the full plain-English analysis and holdings
Start my free 30-day trial → No credit card required
👀 Take a quick tour of the site → 60 seconds · click a real case · no login

Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.

Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.