← Case library
3rd DCAJanuary 4, 2023Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with instructions⭐ Notable

State v. Rojas

Case No. 3D2021-1018

The Third DCA held that a trial court lacked authority under Rule 3.800(c) to mitigate a defendant's sentence below the mandatory minimum terms he had expressly agreed to in a negotiated plea 'hammer clause' governing any future violation of community control/probation, where he also waived the right to seek mitigation. The court reversed the mitigated three-year sentences and ordered reinstatement of the original ten-year and five-year agreed sentences, while affirming the finding that the defendant willfully violated community control. It also held the State had a statutory right to appeal under section 924.07(1)(i) because the mitigated sentence fell below the lowest permissible guidelines sentence.

Key facts

  • Defendant Rojas pleaded guilty to charges with a negotiated plea agreement that included a 'hammer clause' specifying mandatory minimum sentences (ten years and five years) if he violated the terms of community control/probation.
  • The trial court found Rojas willfully violated community control and then mitigated his sentences below the agreed mandatory minimums to three years each.
  • +2 more key facts with a free trial

Why it matters

This decision reinforces and extends the Gutierrez/Swett line of cases enforcing 'hammer clause' plea agreements that specify mandatory sentences upon violation of probation or community control, confirming that trial… — full analysis with a trial

🔒 Read the full opinion, holding & search the library

The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision are available to members. Start a free 30-day trial — no credit card.

Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.

Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.