← Case library
3rd DCAAugust 7, 2019Petition Granted; Order Quashed and Remanded⭐ Notable

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Caribbean Rehabilitation Center, Inc.

Case No. 19-0366

State Farm prevailed in county court on a PIP-type claim and obtained a section 768.79 fee award, then prevailed again in the circuit court appellate division, which denied its motion for appellate attorney's fees without explanation. On second-tier certiorari, the Third District quashed, holding that where entitlement to section 768.79 fees has been established in the trial court, the circuit court sitting in its appellate capacity departs from the essential requirements of law by failing to conditionally grant appellate fees under the same statute.

Key facts

  • State Farm obtained a judgment in county court on a PIP claim against Caribbean Rehabilitation Center and was awarded attorney's fees under section 768.79.
  • State Farm prevailed again when the circuit court appellate division affirmed the county court judgment.
  • +2 more key facts with a free trial

Why it matters

This gives insurers and other PFS-prevailing parties a direct, citable route to second-tier certiorari when the circuit court appellate division silently denies appellate fees under section 768.79. It confirms that… — full analysis with a trial

Best value · free

Read the full opinion, holdings & search — free for 30 days

The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision — in your hands.

  • Search every tracked Florida decision in seconds
  • Save, tag & file the cases that matter into your own library
  • Read the full plain-English analysis and holdings
Start my free 30-day trial → No credit card required
👀 Take a quick tour of the site → 60 seconds · click a real case · no login

Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.

Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.