← Case library
3rd DCAJune 26, 2019Reversed and Remanded⭐ Notable

St. Brendan High School, Inc. v. Neff

Case No. 18-2579

A private Catholic high school expelled a student after her parents sued the school for personal injuries she sustained during off-campus community service; the trial court granted a temporary injunction compelling readmission with its reasoning stated only on the record. The Third DCA reversed and vacated, holding the parents failed to present competent substantial evidence on each of the four injunction elements and the trial court failed to make the required specific findings.

Key facts

  • St. Brendan High School expelled a student after her parents sued the school for personal injuries sustained during off-campus community service.
  • The trial court granted a temporary injunction compelling the student's readmission, with its reasoning stated only on the record without specific written findings on each injunction element.
  • +2 more key facts with a free trial

Why it matters

The opinion is a reusable roadmap for attacking temporary injunctions: it reiterates that findings on all four elements must appear and be supported by competent substantial evidence, and that stating reasons 'on the… — full analysis with a trial

Best value · free

Read the full opinion, holdings & search — free for 30 days

The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision — in your hands.

  • Search every tracked Florida decision in seconds
  • Save, tag & file the cases that matter into your own library
  • Read the full plain-English analysis and holdings
Start my free 30-day trial → No credit card required
👀 Take a quick tour of the site → 60 seconds · click a real case · no login

Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.

Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.