← Case library
3rd DCADecember 31, 2025Affirmed

South Shore Venture, LLC, etc. v. The 20 Condominium Association, Inc.

Case No. 2024-1331

The Third District Court of Appeal affirmed, without written analysis, the Miami-Dade Circuit Court's judgment in favor of The 20 Condominium Association, Inc. against South Shore Venture, LLC in a dispute rooted in the Florida Condominium Act. The per curiam opinion cites only Mack v. Universal Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., 321 So. 3d 901 (Fla. 2d DCA 2021) — a Second DCA decision addressing prevailing-party fee entitlement under Section 718.303(1) — without further elaboration.

Key facts

  • South Shore Venture, LLC (appellant) and The 20 Condominium Association, Inc. (appellee) have been embroiled in litigation since at least 2011, as reflected in Lower Tribunal No. 11-10268-CA-01 in Miami-Dade County Circuit Court.
  • The appeal was from a final judgment of Circuit Judges Lourdes Simon and Alan Fine, both of whom handled the case at the trial level.
  • +2 more key facts with a free trial

Holdings

  • Under Mack v. Universal Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., 321 So. 3d 901 (Fla. 2d DCA 2021), a prevailing party in Florida Condominium Act litigation is entitled to attorney's fees under Section…
Best value · free

Read the full opinion, holdings & search — free for 30 days

The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision — in your hands.

  • Search every tracked Florida decision in seconds
  • Save, tag & file the cases that matter into your own library
  • Read the full plain-English analysis and holdings
Start my free 30-day trial → No credit card required
👀 Take a quick tour of the site → 60 seconds · click a real case · no login

Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.

Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.