← Case library
3rd DCANovember 4, 2020Reversed and Remanded⭐ Notable

SHEDDF2-FL3, LLC v. Penthouse South, LLC

Case No. 19-1100

A commercial borrower defaulted under a forbearance and partial settlement agreement that allowed the lender, upon any monetary default, to immediately record escrowed warranty deeds without notice or cure and waived redemption rights. The trial court invalidated that remedy as unconscionable and compelled the lender to accept payoff and reconvey the units. The Third DCA reversed, holding that because the obligors conceded there was no evidence of procedural unconscionability, their unconscionability challenge failed as a matter of law regardless of how oppressive the term appeared.

Key facts

  • SHEDDF2-FL3, LLC (lender) and Penthouse South, LLC (borrower) entered into a forbearance and partial settlement agreement that included a remedy allowing the lender to immediately record escrowed warranty deeds upon any monetary default without notice, opportunity to cure, or redemption rights.
  • The borrower defaulted on the loan, and the lender sought to enforce the deed-in-escrow remedy; the trial court invalidated the remedy as unconscionable and ordered the lender to accept payoff funds and reconvey the units.
  • +2 more key facts with a free trial

Why it matters

This is a strong authority for lenders and transactional litigators enforcing negotiated default remedies, including deeds in lieu held in escrow and waivers of redemption rights, against equity-based attacks. It… — full analysis with a trial

🔒 Read the full opinion, holding & search the library

The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision are available to members. Start a free 30-day trial — no credit card.

Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.

Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.