← Case library
1st DCASeptember 9, 2026Affirmed in part, Reversed in part, and Remanded⭐ Notable

Shannon v. Mi Tien-Sheui (a/k/a Grace Wang)

Case No. 1D2025-1444

A surviving spouse sought a declaration that she owned, by right of survivorship as a tenant by the entireties, the rents from a 60-year ground lease that named both spouses as 'Landlord' even though the husband held sole fee title. The First DCA affirmed subject-matter jurisdiction over the declaratory action brought outside probate, but reversed summary judgment for the widow, holding that whether a tenancy by the entireties (including a right of survivorship) was created presents disputed issues of fact given the lease's inconsistent language and the decedent's contrary testamentary devises.

Key facts

  • Surviving spouse Shannon sought a declaratory judgment that she owned rents from a 60-year ground lease as a tenant by the entireties with right of survivorship, even though her deceased husband held sole fee title to the underlying property.
  • The lease named both spouses as 'Landlord' but omitted the 'Husband and Wife' designation in the rent-payment clause, and the husband's will contained devises of the leased property that appeared inconsistent with survivorship rights.
  • +2 more key facts with a free trial

Why it matters

Useful for estate and real property litigators: it confirms that a leasehold income stream can be entireties property, but that 'Husband and Wife' language in an instrument is not automatically conclusive — intent to… — full analysis with a trial

🔒 Read the full opinion, holding & search the library

The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision are available to members. Start a free 30-day trial — no credit card.

Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.

Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.