Segovia v. State
The Third DCA granted a writ of prohibition, holding that a clerk-issued 'praecipe for court notice' does not satisfy section 948.06(1)'s requirement that the 'committing trial court judge' issue a notice to appear to toll a probationary period. Because the trial judge did not actually issue (or direct the issuance of) a notice to appear until after Segovia's probation had already expired, the trial court lost subject matter jurisdiction over the alleged violation.
Key facts
- Segovia was on probation when the trial court sought to proceed on an alleged probation violation, but a clerk-issued praecipe for court notice was generated before probation expired.
- The trial judge did not issue or direct issuance of a valid notice to appear until after Segovia's probationary period had already expired.
- +2 more key facts with a free trial
Why it matters
This decision gives criminal-defense practitioners a concrete basis to challenge VOP jurisdiction where courts or clerks rely on routine administrative notices rather than a judicially-issued notice to appear before… — full analysis with a trial
🔒 Read the full opinion, holding & search the library
The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision are available to members. Start a free 30-day trial — no credit card.
Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.
Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.