Schmidt v. Stokes McMillan Antúnez Martinez-Lejarza P.A.
The Third DCA granted certiorari and quashed the portion of the post-judgment order compelling the petitioners to produce Rule 1.560(c) financial discovery, holding that full payment of the liquidated Confirmation Judgment within the rule's 45-day period 'satisfied' the judgment and eliminated any basis for the fact-information-sheet discovery. Because the fee entitlement was not yet liquidated, the paid judgment was reduced to a non-final, non-executable fee-entitlement order, making Rule 1.560 discovery premature.
🔒 Read the full opinion, holding & search the library
The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision are available to members. Start a free 30-day trial — no credit card.
Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.
Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.