← Case library
4th DCAJuly 3, 2024Affirmed⭐ Notable

Scherf v. Tom Krips Construction, Inc.

Case No. 4D2023-0337

Owners sought leave five and a half years into a construction lien foreclosure suit to amend their answer to deny compliance with conditions precedent, adding that the contractor failed to serve a final contractor's affidavit under section 713.06(3)(d)1. The Fourth District affirmed the denial of leave to amend and the summary judgment for the lienor, holding that the belated amendment would prejudice the contractor because the one-year lien limitations period had expired and the defect could no longer be cured.

Key facts

  • Owners sought leave to amend their answer in a construction lien foreclosure suit filed five and a half years earlier, attempting to add a defense that the contractor failed to serve a final contractor's affidavit as required by section 713.06(3)(d)1.
  • The trial court denied the owners' motion to amend and granted summary judgment for the lienor-contractor.
  • +1 more key fact with a free trial

Why it matters

The opinion extends the Ingersoll/Stoll/Oliveros presuit-notice waiver line from medical malpractice into the construction lien context, giving lienors a strong prejudice argument against late-raised… — full analysis with a trial

Best value · free

Read the full opinion, holdings & search — free for 30 days

The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision — in your hands.

  • Search every tracked Florida decision in seconds
  • Save, tag & file the cases that matter into your own library
  • Read the full plain-English analysis and holdings
Start my free 30-day trial → No credit card required
👀 Take a quick tour of the site → 60 seconds · click a real case · no login

Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.

Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.