← Case library
2nd DCASeptember 23, 2022Affirmed⭐ Notable

Ruiz v. Wendy's Trucking, LLC

Case No. 21-0485

A truck mechanic was catastrophically injured while working under a leased-space tenant's truck in the Garcias' commercial truck parking lot. The Second DCA affirmed summary judgment for the landowners, holding the claims sounded in premises liability (passive negligence) rather than ordinary negligence, that no foreseeable zone of risk arose merely from owning a parking lot where lessees violated a no-mechanical-work rule, and that a landlord's right to enter and instruct lessees is not the control required to impose a duty to a lessee's invitee.

Key facts

  • A truck mechanic was catastrophically injured while performing mechanical work under a truck in the Garcias' commercial truck parking lot, which was leased to a trucking company under a lease prohibiting mechanical work on the premises.
  • The mechanic sued the Garcias (landowners) for negligence; the trial court granted summary judgment for the defendants.
  • +2 more key facts with a free trial

Why it matters

A useful defense-side opinion for landlords and commercial property owners: it holds that retained rights of entry and rule-setting are not the 'control' that creates a premises-liability duty for injuries caused by a… — full analysis with a trial

Best value · free

Read the full opinion, holdings & search — free for 30 days

The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision — in your hands.

  • Search every tracked Florida decision in seconds
  • Save, tag & file the cases that matter into your own library
  • Read the full plain-English analysis and holdings
Start my free 30-day trial → No credit card required
👀 Take a quick tour of the site → 60 seconds · click a real case · no login

Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.

Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.