← Case library
2nd DCAJuly 19, 2024Affirmed; conflict certified⚡ Circuit Split Resolved

Rivera v. Salas

Case No. 2D2022-4066

A man who donated sperm used for an at-home artificial insemination of one member of a lesbian couple petitioned to establish paternity after the couple separated. The Second DCA affirmed the denial of the petition, holding that section 742.14, Florida Statutes, strips any sperm, egg, or preembryo donor of parental rights unless the donor is part of a statutory 'commissioning couple' or has executed a preplanned adoption agreement, and that the statute applies regardless of whether 'assisted reproductive technology' (laboratory handling of eggs or preembryos) was used. The court reaffirmed A.A.B. v. B.O.C. and certified conflict with the Fifth DCA's decision in Enriquez v. Velazquez.

Key facts

  • Man donated sperm for at-home artificial insemination of one member of a lesbian couple; couple later separated.
  • Sperm donor petitioned to establish paternity; trial court denied the petition.
  • +2 more key facts with a free trial

Why it matters

This opinion creates an express district conflict on the scope of section 742.14 and sets up likely Florida Supreme Court review, so counsel handling parentage or donor-agreement disputes must know which district's rule… — full analysis with a trial

Best value · free

Read the full opinion, holdings & search — free for 30 days

The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision — in your hands.

  • Search every tracked Florida decision in seconds
  • Save, tag & file the cases that matter into your own library
  • Read the full plain-English analysis and holdings
Start my free 30-day trial → No credit card required
👀 Take a quick tour of the site → 60 seconds · click a real case · no login

Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.

Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.