← Case library
6th DCAOctober 27, 2023Reversed and Remanded in part; Dismissed in part⭐ Notable

Riggins v. Clifford R. Rhoades, P.A.

Case No. 6D2023-0489

Attorneys sued former clients for unpaid fees; the clients counterclaimed and filed a third-party complaint for legal malpractice. The trial court dismissed both with prejudice after taking judicial notice of a final judgment from a separate Okeechobee County action attached only to the motion to dismiss. The Sixth DCA reversed the dismissal of the third-party complaint, holding judicial notice cannot be used to circumvent the four-corners rule absent a stipulation, and dismissed the appeal of the counterclaim dismissal for lack of jurisdiction because the malpractice counterclaim was compulsory.

Key facts

  • Law firm Riggins sued former clients Clifford R. Rhoades, P.A. for unpaid legal fees in the trial court.
  • Former clients counterclaimed for legal malpractice and filed a third-party complaint, both arising from the same representation as the fee dispute.
  • +2 more key facts with a free trial

Why it matters

The opinion is a clean, citable statement that judicial notice cannot be used to smuggle extrinsic judgments (or res judicata/collateral estoppel defenses) into a motion to dismiss — such defenses belong on summary… — full analysis with a trial

Best value · free

Read the full opinion, holdings & search — free for 30 days

The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision — in your hands.

  • Search every tracked Florida decision in seconds
  • Save, tag & file the cases that matter into your own library
  • Read the full plain-English analysis and holdings
Start my free 30-day trial → No credit card required
👀 Take a quick tour of the site → 60 seconds · click a real case · no login

Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.

Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.