← Case library
3rd DCAJanuary 29, 2025Affirmed⭐ Notable

Reeves v. Gross

Case No. 3D2023-0856

The Third DCA affirmed summary judgment rejecting a grandson's will contest based on alleged lack of testamentary capacity. Applying the post-2021 federal summary judgment standard, the court held that a retained geriatric psychiatrist's records-only affidavit opining the 100-year-old testator suffered dementia with delirium during a three-month window failed to create a genuine issue of fact, because it did not supply a fact-based chain of reasoning rebutting the record evidence of lucidity at the moment of execution.

Key facts

  • Grandson brought a will contest challenging the testamentary capacity of his 100-year-old grandmother at the time she executed her will.
  • The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the estate, rejecting the grandson's lack-of-capacity claim based on the evidence presented.
  • +2 more key facts with a free trial

Why it matters

This is one of the clearer Third DCA applications of the Rule 1.510/Celotex standard to a heightened substantive burden "presumption of testamentary capacity" and shows that conclusory, records-only expert opinions will… — full analysis with a trial

Best value · free

Read the full opinion, holdings & search — free for 30 days

The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision — in your hands.

  • Search every tracked Florida decision in seconds
  • Save, tag & file the cases that matter into your own library
  • Read the full plain-English analysis and holdings
Start my free 30-day trial → No credit card required
👀 Take a quick tour of the site → 60 seconds · click a real case · no login

Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.

Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.