← Case library
2nd DCAOctober 23, 2026Reversed and Remanded⭐ Notable

Real Estate Services Group, Inc. v. Mills

Case No. 2D2024-2630

After RESG was the successful bidder at an HOA lien foreclosure sale and the clerk issued a certificate of sale, the homeowner paid the judgment and, together with the association, submitted an agreed ex parte order vacating the sale and returning the bid funds without serving RESG. The Second DCA reversed, holding that a third-party purchaser acquires a protectable legal interest upon purchase and issuance of the certificate of sale and cannot be deprived of it without notice and an opportunity to be heard.

Key facts

  • Real Estate Services Group, Inc. (RESG) was the successful bidder at an HOA lien foreclosure sale and received a certificate of sale from the clerk.
  • The homeowner paid off the judgment, and the homeowner and HOA association jointly submitted an agreed ex parte order to vacate the sale and return RESG's bid funds without notice to RESG.
  • +2 more key facts with a free trial

Why it matters

This gives third-party foreclosure-sale purchasers a clean, citable Second DCA holding that an agreed or ex parte order vacating a sale — including one based on post-sale payoff by the owner — is void for due process… — full analysis with a trial

Best value · free

Read the full opinion, holdings & search — free for 30 days

The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision — in your hands.

  • Search every tracked Florida decision in seconds
  • Save, tag & file the cases that matter into your own library
  • Read the full plain-English analysis and holdings
Start my free 30-day trial → No credit card required
👀 Take a quick tour of the site → 60 seconds · click a real case · no login

Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.

Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.