← Case library
3rd DCADecember 17, 2025Dismissed

Raziel Ofer v. Metropolitan Mortgage Company, LLC, et al.

Case No. 2024-1845

The Third DCA dismissed a civil appeal and imposed filing restrictions against self-represented appellant Raziel Ofer after a court-appointed commissioner found that Ofer had fabricated an email he submitted to the court accusing opposing counsel and the trial judge of bribery. Ofer was barred from any future filings before the Third DCA absent review and signature by a Florida Bar member in good standing.

Key facts

  • Ofer, self-represented, appealed from Miami-Dade County Circuit Court case no. 22-3487-CA-01, and the underlying appeal was dismissed on August 22, 2025, for ongoing failure to comply with and contempt of the lower tribunal's discovery order.
  • Ofer attached to a court filing a purported email dated April 18, 2025, accusing appellee Drexel Financial Services, LLC's counsel and the trial judge of bribery; the Third DCA retained jurisdiction and appointed a commissioner to investigate.
  • +2 more key facts with a free trial

Holdings

  • An appellate court retains jurisdiction after dismissal to investigate potential fraud on the court and may appoint a commissioner to conduct an evidentiary hearing, make factual findings…
  • +2 more holdings with a free trial
Best value · free

Read the full opinion, holdings & search — free for 30 days

The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision — in your hands.

  • Search every tracked Florida decision in seconds
  • Save, tag & file the cases that matter into your own library
  • Read the full plain-English analysis and holdings
Start my free 30-day trial → No credit card required
👀 Take a quick tour of the site → 60 seconds · click a real case · no login

Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.

Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.