← Case library
3rd DCAFebruary 8, 2023Affirmed↗ Precedent Departure

R.A. v. State

Case No. 3D2022-0546

The Third DCA affirmed a juvenile's adjudication for battery on a law enforcement officer, holding that officers lawfully detained R.A.—a 16-year-old found alone at night outside a closed high school—both under the community caretaking doctrine and based on probable cause for loitering and prowling after she gave evasive answers and fled. Judge Miller dissented at length, arguing that the 35-minute handcuffed detention in a locked patrol car exceeded any permissible welfare check, that the majority improperly blended community caretaking with criminal investigation, and that post-Caniglia v. Strom precedent casts doubt on expansive application of the community caretaking exception outside the vehicle context.

Key facts

  • R.A., a 16-year-old, was found alone outside a closed high school at night in a high-crime area and was approached by officers for questioning.
  • R.A. gave evasive answers and false information to officers, then fled when pursued; officers handcuffed her and detained her in a locked patrol car for approximately 35 minutes.
  • +2 more key facts with a free trial

Why it matters

This opinion is significant because it applies and extends the community caretaking doctrine to justify a lengthy, physically restrictive detention of a juvenile, and does so against a backdrop of growing uncertainty… — full analysis with a trial

🔒 Read the full opinion, holding & search the library

The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision are available to members. Start a free 30-day trial — no credit card.

Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.

Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.