Publix Supermarkets, Inc. v. Jonida Goga, et al.
The Florida Supreme Court resolved a conflict among the district courts over the standard of review for a dismissal ordered as a sanction for fraud on the court, quashing the Fourth District's use of a specialized 'more stringent' or 'narrowed' abuse of discretion standard. The Court held that ordinary, component-specific standards apply: factual findings are reviewed for competent, substantial evidence, legal conclusions de novo, and the choice of sanction for abuse of discretion.
Key facts
- Jonida Goga slipped on spilled dish soap at a Publix and sued for premises liability, claiming severe and permanent physical limitations including inability to lift her children, bend, run, or stand for long periods.
- A private investigator hired by Publix videoed Goga picking up and carrying her children, bending at the waist to load her vehicle, and playing in the pool without apparent discomfort, contradicting her interrogatory answers and deposition testimony.
- +1 more key fact with a free trial
Holdings
- There is no unique 'more stringent' or 'narrowed' abuse of discretion standard for fraud-on-the-court dismissals; appellate courts must apply traditional standards of review to each…
- +1 more holding with a free trial
Why it matters
This decision standardizes appellate review of fraud-on-the-court dismissals statewide, eliminating the amorphous heightened-deference standard that had produced inconsistent outcomes on similar… — full analysis with a trial
Read the full opinion, holdings & search — free for 30 days
The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision — in your hands.
- Search every tracked Florida decision in seconds
- Save, tag & file the cases that matter into your own library
- Read the full plain-English analysis and holdings
Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.
Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.