← Case library
4th DCASeptember 30, 2026Affirmed in part; reversed and remanded in part (unjust enrichment award reduced by 15%)⭐ Notable

North Palm Motors, LLC v. Custom Fleet Services, Inc.

Case No. 4D2025-0167

After an eleven-day bench trial, the Fourth DCA affirmed a judgment holding the Schumacher defendants liable for trade secret misappropriation on a 'reason to know' basis under FUTSA while affirming the trial court's refusal to find willful and malicious misappropriation (and thus to award attorney's fees or exemplary damages) and its refusal to award 'actual loss' damages. The court reversed only the $864,000 unjust enrichment award, directing a 15% reduction because the plaintiff's own expert conceded 15% of Auto Rentals' revenue could not be tied to the misappropriated customer list.

Key facts

  • North Palm Motors, LLC sued Custom Fleet Services, Inc. and the Schumacher defendants for trade secret misappropriation involving a customer list used in the auto rental business.
  • After an eleven-day bench trial, the trial court found the defendants liable for misappropriation on a 'reason to know' basis, but declined to award willful and malicious damages, attorney's fees, or actual loss damages; it did award $864,000 in unjust enrichment.
  • +2 more key facts with a free trial

Why it matters

This is a rare, comprehensive Fourth DCA treatment of damages, fees, and exemplary damages under the Florida Uniform Trade Secrets Act, and it expressly aligns FUTSA's 'willful and malicious' standard with the… — full analysis with a trial

🔒 Read the full opinion, holding & search the library

The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision are available to members. Start a free 30-day trial — no credit card.

Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.

Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.