Noel v. State
Noel appealed his county-court misdemeanor conviction for assault on a person 65 or older, arguing the county court lacked subject matter jurisdiction because the underlying facts (threatening to kill the victim while holding a box cutter) could support a felony charge. The Third DCA affirmed, holding that jurisdiction is determined from the face of the information, and because the State expressly charged and cited only the misdemeanor statutes (§§784.011, 784.08(2)(d)), the county court properly retained jurisdiction even though the alleged facts might have supported a felony.
Key facts
- Noel was convicted in county court of misdemeanor assault on a person 65 or older after allegedly threatening to kill the victim while holding a box cutter.
- Noel appealed, arguing the county court lacked subject matter jurisdiction because the underlying facts could support a felony charge rather than the misdemeanor charged.
- +2 more key facts with a free trial
Why it matters
This opinion reinforces the well-established rule that subject matter jurisdiction in criminal cases is determined strictly from the face of the charging document, not from the underlying facts alleged. It gives… — full analysis with a trial
🔒 Read the full opinion, holding & search the library
The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision are available to members. Start a free 30-day trial — no credit card.
Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.
Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.