← Case library
3rd DCAOctober 10, 2019Reversed and Remanded⭐ Notable

National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2007-3 v. De Leon

Case No. 18-1494

A student loan lender sued the borrower after default; the borrower obtained summary judgment on res judicata grounds because the lender, a scheduled creditor in the borrower's earlier Chapter 7 case, filed no proof of claim and no adversary proceeding. The Third DCA reversed, distinguishing Education Resources Institute v. Rickard and holding that res judicata bars only claims actually litigated and decided, and the bankruptcy court never adjudicated any claim regarding the student loan.

Key facts

  • National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2007-3, a student loan lender, sued De Leon, a borrower, for breach of a student loan agreement after default.
  • De Leon obtained summary judgment based on res judicata, arguing the lender was a scheduled creditor in De Leon's earlier Chapter 7 bankruptcy case but filed no proof of claim and no adversary proceeding regarding the student loan debt.
  • +1 more key fact with a free trial

Why it matters

The opinion gives creditors' counsel a citable limit on the 'could have been raised' language in Rickard, confirming that mere inaction in a debtor's bankruptcy does not create claim preclusion where nothing was… — full analysis with a trial

Best value · free

Read the full opinion, holdings & search — free for 30 days

The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision — in your hands.

  • Search every tracked Florida decision in seconds
  • Save, tag & file the cases that matter into your own library
  • Read the full plain-English analysis and holdings
Start my free 30-day trial → No credit card required
👀 Take a quick tour of the site → 60 seconds · click a real case · no login

Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.

Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.