← Case library
4th DCAJanuary 21, 2026Motion to Certify Question Denied🔬 Novel Issue

Myrick v. State

Case No. 4D2024-3148

In this order, the Fourth District denied the State's motion to certify as a question of great public importance whether a statewide grand jury may indict for violations of its own secrecy under section 905.395, Florida Statutes. The majority held the issue was one of straightforward statutory construction—applying the rule of lenity to conclude the Legislature did not empower statewide grand juries to enforce their own secrecy provisions by indictment—and that the Office of Statewide Prosecution provides an adequate alternative remedy. A dissenting associate judge argued the split among jurists over the statute's meaning and the institutional stakes for statewide grand jury authority warranted certification to the Florida Supreme Court.

Key facts

  • Myrick was subject to a statewide grand jury investigation and charges relating to alleged violations of the statewide grand jury's secrecy provisions under section 905.395, Florida Statutes.
  • The Fourth District Court of Appeal reviewed the State's motion to certify to the Florida Supreme Court whether a statewide grand jury has authority to indict for violations of its own secrecy rules.
  • +2 more key facts with a free trial

Why it matters

This order addresses a novel and narrow question—whether a statewide grand jury may indict for breaches of its own secrecy under section 905.395—that has not been squarely resolved and on which the panel itself split… — full analysis with a trial

🔒 Read the full opinion, holding & search the library

The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision are available to members. Start a free 30-day trial — no credit card.

Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.

Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.