← Case library
2nd DCAMay 10, 2023Petition granted in part and denied in part; order quashed in part⭐ Notable

Mt. Hawley Insurance Co. v. Russo

Case No. 2D2022-2471

Mt. Hawley sought certiorari review of a trial court order permitting discovery to proceed and granting a motion to compel, where no coverage action was pending in the trial court and a coverage action was pending in federal district court. The Second District granted the petition in part and quashed the order to the extent it authorized discovery on coverage matters, denying the petition in all other respects.

Key facts

  • Mt. Hawley Insurance Co. sought certiorari review of a trial court order that permitted discovery to proceed and granted a motion to compel discovery on insurance coverage matters.
  • No coverage action was pending before the trial court that issued the discovery order, but a coverage action was simultaneously pending in federal district court.
  • +1 more key fact with a free trial

Why it matters

The decision gives insurers a concrete certiorari path to block coverage discovery in an underlying liability case when the coverage dispute is being litigated elsewhere, including in federal court. Litigators can cite… — full analysis with a trial

Best value · free

Read the full opinion, holdings & search — free for 30 days

The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision — in your hands.

  • Search every tracked Florida decision in seconds
  • Save, tag & file the cases that matter into your own library
  • Read the full plain-English analysis and holdings
Start my free 30-day trial → No credit card required
👀 Take a quick tour of the site → 60 seconds · click a real case · no login

Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.

Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.