← Case library
3rd DCAApril 21, 2021Affirmed⭐ Notable

Morburger v. J. Reporting, Inc.

Case No. 21-0115

In a small claims suit over roughly $400 in unpaid court reporting invoices, the defendant argued on the eve of trial that the plaintiff failed to plead and prove compliance with the Fictitious Name Act, section 865.09, Florida Statutes. The Third District affirmed, explaining that the Florida Small Claims Rules impose only minimal pleading requirements — a concise statement of claim with any written document attached — and that additional pleading requirements cannot be imported into those rules. The court also held the fictitious-name objection, raised on the eve of trial rather than at the pretrial conference, came too late, and noted it would fail on the merits because noncompliance does not impair contract enforceability.

Key facts

  • Morburger, a court reporting business, sued J. Reporting, Inc. in small claims court for approximately $400 in unpaid invoices for court reporting services.
  • The defendant argued on the eve of trial that the plaintiff failed to plead and prove compliance with Florida's Fictitious Name Act, section 865.09, and that this deficiency prevented recovery.
  • +2 more key facts with a free trial

Why it matters

The opinion is a rare published explanation of how small claims pleading practice differs from ordinary civil litigation, useful to any practitioner defending or prosecuting county court claims under the Small Claims… — full analysis with a trial

🔒 Read the full opinion, holding & search the library

The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision are available to members. Start a free 30-day trial — no credit card.

Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.

Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.