Moore v. State
The Fourth DCA reversed misdemeanor animal-abandonment/confinement convictions, holding the State failed to prove appellant personally confined or kept the dogs in violation of § 828.13, Fla. Stat. Mere presence on the property and knowledge that the dogs were confined in poor conditions—without evidence of ownership, custody, or participation in the confinement—was legally insufficient to sustain the convictions. The court also rejected the State's closing argument theory that appellant's failure to intervene equated to a statutory violation.
Key facts
- Appellant was present on a property where two outside dogs were confined in poor conditions under the sole care and control of appellant's estranged husband.
- Appellant was charged with and convicted of misdemeanor animal abandonment and confinement violations under Florida Statute § 828.13.
- +2 more key facts with a free trial
Why it matters
This decision clarifies that Florida's animal cruelty confinement statute (§828.13) requires proof of active participation in confining or keeping an animal, not mere knowledge or property ownership, giving defense… — full analysis with a trial
🔒 Read the full opinion, holding & search the library
The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision are available to members. Start a free 30-day trial — no credit card.
Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.
Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.