← Case library
3rd DCAJune 25, 2026Affirmed⭐ Notable

Michel Valdez v. Progressive Select Insurance Company

Case No. 2025-0119

The Third DCA affirmed, applying the principle of priority, which counsels against duplicative concurrent litigation to avoid wasting judicial resources and the risk of inconsistent judgments. The court confirmed the doctrine applies not only across states or federal/state courts but also between cases pending in different circuits or different divisions of the same circuit within Florida.

Key facts

  • An insured pursued a county court action against Progressive Select Insurance Company in Miami-Dade County.
  • A related case was pending concurrently, implicating the doctrine known as the principle of priority.
  • +1 more key fact with a free trial

Holdings

  • The principle of priority—which bars unnecessarily duplicative concurrent proceedings—applies where a second-filed action is sufficiently similar in parties and issues to the prior-filed…

Why it matters

The affirmance reinforces that Florida's principle of priority reaches duplicative cases pending within the same state—even in different divisions of one circuit—and that trial courts may consider matters outside the… — full analysis with a trial

Best value · free

Read the full opinion, holdings & search — free for 30 days

The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision — in your hands.

  • Search every tracked Florida decision in seconds
  • Save, tag & file the cases that matter into your own library
  • Read the full plain-English analysis and holdings
Start my free 30-day trial → No credit card required
👀 Take a quick tour of the site → 60 seconds · click a real case · no login

Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.

Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.