Martin v. State
The Fourth District granted a writ of prohibition, holding that the State failed to overcome by clear and convincing evidence a defendant's Stand Your Ground immunity claim in a battery-on-elderly-person case. The court found that, given the defendant's physical disability, the victim's verbal threats and physical encroachment, and the victim grabbing the defendant's shirt as he tried to walk away for a third time, a reasonable person in the same circumstances would have used the same force. Judge Warner dissented, arguing there was no evidence of imminent unlawful force justifying the punch.
Key facts
- Defendant was charged with battery on an elderly person after punching the victim during a confrontation.
- The trial court denied defendant's Stand Your Ground immunity motion, finding the force used was not justified.
- +2 more key facts with a free trial
Why it matters
This opinion illustrates how appellate courts apply de novo review to a trial court's ultimate legal conclusion on proportionality/reasonableness in Stand Your Ground cases, even where the underlying facts are contested… — full analysis with a trial
🔒 Read the full opinion, holding & search the library
The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision are available to members. Start a free 30-day trial — no credit card.
Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.
Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.