Manuel V. Feijoo, M.D., P.A., aao Roberto Gonzalez v. Infinity Indemnity Insurance Company
The Third DCA affirmed judgment for Infinity Indemnity in a PIP dispute, holding that the insured's failure to submit to a properly noticed examination under oath (EUO) is a condition precedent to PIP benefits under §627.736(6)(g), Fla. Stat., and that the medical provider as assignee takes no greater rights than the insured — including the obligation to cooperate with the EUO.
Key facts
- Medical provider Manuel V. Feijoo, M.D., P.A. and Roberto Gonzalez (assignee and insured) sued Infinity Indemnity Insurance Company to recover Personal Injury Protection (PIP) benefits.
- The insured failed to appear for a properly noticed examination under oath (EUO) requested by the insurer as part of its investigation into the PIP claim.
- +2 more key facts with a free trial
Why it matters
This decision affirms the principle that PIP EUO non-compliance is a claim-barring condition precedent, not merely a breach of a post-loss obligation. It also confirms that medical providers litigating as assignees of… — full analysis with a trial
Read the full opinion, holdings & search — free for 30 days
The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision — in your hands.
- Search every tracked Florida decision in seconds
- Save, tag & file the cases that matter into your own library
- Read the full plain-English analysis and holdings
Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.
Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.