← Case library
2nd DCAJune 3, 2026Affirmed

Luis Medina v. Tammy Medina

Case No. 2D2025-1362

The Second District Court of Appeal affirmed per curiam without written opinion. Both appellant Luis Medina and appellee Tammy Medina appeared pro se in this appeal from a Pinellas County circuit court ruling. NOTE: PDF-cache collision detected — the pipeline metadata identified this as case 2025-1362 (Kuznitz v. Homeowners Choice, 3rd DCA) but the PDF is a separate 2nd DCA case.

Key facts

  • Luis Medina appealed a ruling from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County (Judge Frederick Lincoln Pollack).
  • Both parties appeared pro se.
  • +2 more key facts with a free trial

Holdings

  • Per curiam affirmance without written opinion; no legal rule stated.
Best value · free

Read the full opinion, holdings & search — free for 30 days

The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision — in your hands.

  • Search every tracked Florida decision in seconds
  • Save, tag & file the cases that matter into your own library
  • Read the full plain-English analysis and holdings
Start my free 30-day trial → No credit card required
👀 Take a quick tour of the site → 60 seconds · click a real case · no login

Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.

Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.