← Case library
3rd DCAAugust 20, 2026Affirmed⭐ Notable

Luis Armando Chanlatte v. Consolidated Real Estate Investments, etc.

Case No. 2025-1886

In a companion citation opinion to Valdes, the Third District affirmed a county court judgment for the mobile home park owner against a Li'l Abner park resident. The affirmance rests entirely on section 723.061, Florida Statutes, and the court's April 2026 decision in Owners of Trailers at Li'l Abner Trailer Park v. CREI Holdings, LLC, 51 Fla. L. Weekly D791.

Key facts

  • Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County (Judge Michael G. Barket), Lower Tribunal No. 25-88312-CC-05.
  • Appellant Luis Armando Chanlatte, a mobile home park resident represented by Wesoloski Carlson, P.A. and David J. Winker, P.A., appealed a judgment in favor of park owner Consolidated Real Estate Investments.
  • +2 more key facts with a free trial

Holdings

  • Section 723.061, Florida Statutes, together with the Third District's decision in Owners of Trailers at Li'l Abner Trailer Park v. CREI Holdings, LLC, governs and resolves the eviction…

Why it matters

Read alongside Valdes, this decision confirms that the Third District is disposing of the individual Li'l Abner resident appeals uniformly and summarily on the strength of its April 2026 CREI Holdings opinion. The… — full analysis with a trial

Best value · free

Read the full opinion, holdings & search — free for 30 days

The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision — in your hands.

  • Search every tracked Florida decision in seconds
  • Save, tag & file the cases that matter into your own library
  • Read the full plain-English analysis and holdings
Start my free 30-day trial → No credit card required
👀 Take a quick tour of the site → 60 seconds · click a real case · no login

Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.

Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.