Ludeca, Inc. v. Alignment and Condition Monitoring, Inc.
The Third DCA granted mandamus compelling the trial court to remove a case from the trial docket because the filing of a compulsory counterclaim reopened the pleadings, divesting the case of 'at issue' status under Rule 1.440, and the trial date fell within the rule's mandatory fifty-day minimum after the last pleading. The court also granted certiorari and quashed an order severing the compulsory trade secret counterclaim from the declaratory relief action, holding that bifurcating inextricably intertwined claims departs from the essential requirements of law.
Key facts
- Ludeca, Inc. sued Alignment and Condition Monitoring, Inc. for declaratory relief; the defendant filed a compulsory counterclaim for trade secret misappropriation after the case was placed 'at issue' and a trial date was set.
- The trial court refused to remove the case from the trial docket despite the counterclaim reopening the pleadings, and it granted defendant's motion to sever the compulsory counterclaim from the main declaratory relief action.
- +2 more key facts with a free trial
Why it matters
This decision gives litigators a reusable two-pronged roadmap: mandamus to enforce Rule 1.440's mandatory 'at issue' and fifty-day requirements when a late-filed counterclaim reopens the pleadings, and certiorari to… — full analysis with a trial
Read the full opinion, holdings & search — free for 30 days
The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision — in your hands.
- Search every tracked Florida decision in seconds
- Save, tag & file the cases that matter into your own library
- Read the full plain-English analysis and holdings
Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.
Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.