← Case library
2nd DCAAugust 2, 2024Affirmed; conflict certified⚡ Circuit Split Resolved

Loumpos v. Bank One

Case No. 2D2022-3908

A judgment creditor of one spouse sought to garnish a bank account originally opened by the husband alone, to which the wife was added months later on new signature cards designating "Joint Tenants by Entirety." The Second District held that neither Beal Bank nor section 655.79(1), Florida Statutes, abrogated the common law unities (possession, interest, title, time, survivorship, marriage) required to create a tenancy by the entireties, so the account lacking the unities of time and title was garnishable. It affirmed denial of the exemption claim and certified conflict with the Fourth District's decision in Versace v. Uruven, LLC.

Key facts

  • Judgment creditor sought to garnish a bank account originally opened by the husband alone, with the wife added months later on new signature cards designated 'Joint Tenants by Entirety.'
  • Trial court denied the wife's claim that the account was exempt from garnishment based on tenancy by the entireties designation.
  • +2 more key facts with a free trial

Why it matters

This creates an express district conflict with the Fourth DCA over whether an express "tenancy by the entireties" designation on a bank signature card alone shields spousal accounts from a single spouse's creditors… — full analysis with a trial

Best value · free

Read the full opinion, holdings & search — free for 30 days

The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision — in your hands.

  • Search every tracked Florida decision in seconds
  • Save, tag & file the cases that matter into your own library
  • Read the full plain-English analysis and holdings
Start my free 30-day trial → No credit card required
👀 Take a quick tour of the site → 60 seconds · click a real case · no login

Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.

Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.