← Case library
6th DCADecember 30, 2024Affirmed in part, Reversed in part, and Remanded with instructions⭐ Notable

Lincoln v. State

Case No. 6D2023-0235

Lincoln was sentenced to life for first-degree felony lewd molestation of a victim under 12, but the jury was actually instructed only on and convicted him of the lesser-included second-degree felony (victim 12-16), based on undisputed trial evidence that the victim was twelve. A clerical error in court records caused the judgment and PSI to erroneously reflect a first-degree felony conviction and life sentence despite the jury's actual verdict. The Sixth DCA held this was fundamental error, found section 924.34 inapplicable since the evidence supported the actual offense of conviction, and remanded for entry of judgment on the second-degree felony with a corrected scoresheet and PSI.

Key facts

  • Lincoln was charged with first-degree felony lewd molestation of a victim under 12, but undisputed trial evidence established the victim was twelve years old.
  • The trial court instructed the jury only on the lesser-included second-degree felony offense (victim 12-16), and the jury convicted Lincoln of that second-degree felony.
  • +2 more key facts with a free trial

Why it matters

This opinion is a useful precedent for practitioners confronting clerical or judicial errors that cause a judgment or sentence to diverge from the jury's actual verdict, particularly in degree-based offenses like… — full analysis with a trial

🔒 Read the full opinion, holding & search the library

The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision are available to members. Start a free 30-day trial — no credit card.

Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.

Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.