← Case library
3rd DCAMay 25, 2022Affirmed⭐ Notable

Lecorps v. Star Lakes Association, Inc.

Case No. 21-2195

After a fire destroyed part of one building in a seventeen-building multicondominium operated by a single association, the association levied a community-wide special assessment to cover restoration costs exceeding insurance proceeds. The trial court first enjoined the assessment, then dissolved the injunction after concluding it had committed legal error. The Third DCA affirmed, holding the association could assess all unit owners under section 718.111(6) (consolidated financial operations for pre-1977 condominiums), that no unit-owner vote was required for urgently needed common-element repairs, and that a trial court need not find changed circumstances to dissolve a temporary injunction it erroneously entered.

Key facts

  • A fire destroyed part of one building in a seventeen-building condominium complex operated by a single association under consolidated financial operations.
  • The association levied a community-wide special assessment to cover restoration costs exceeding insurance proceeds; the trial court initially enjoined the assessment.
  • +2 more key facts with a free trial

Why it matters

The opinion gives community association counsel a clear statement that a single association operating pre-1977 condominiums under a section 718.111(6) consolidation may spread post-casualty shortfall assessments across… — full analysis with a trial

🔒 Read the full opinion, holding & search the library

The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision are available to members. Start a free 30-day trial — no credit card.

Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.

Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.