Laurence v. State
Twelve defendants sought writs of prohibition to disqualify a Monroe County judge whose spouse serves as Executive Director (an administrative, non-supervisory role) of the State Attorney's Office prosecuting their cases. The Third DCA held the disqualification motions were legally insufficient because the spouse's position involved no supervision of prosecutors and no involvement in case prosecution, adopting the reasoning of JEAC Opinion 2023-09 and distinguishing Brewer v. Hughes and Edwards v. State.
Key facts
- Twelve criminal defendants in Monroe County filed motions to disqualify the trial judge based on the judge's spouse serving as Executive Director of the State Attorney's Office prosecuting their cases.
- The spouse held a high-level administrative position with no supervisory authority over prosecutors and no involvement in case prosecution or litigation decisions.
- +2 more key facts with a free trial
Why it matters
This opinion fills a gap the court itself acknowledges — there is very little Florida case law on when a judge must recuse because a spouse or relative works for the prosecuting or defending agency in the same circuit… — full analysis with a trial
🔒 Read the full opinion, holding & search the library
The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision are available to members. Start a free 30-day trial — no credit card.
Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.
Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.