Laurence v. State
Twelve consolidated defendants sought writs of prohibition to disqualify a Monroe County judge whose spouse became Executive Director of the State Attorney's Office in an administrative (non-attorney-supervisory) role. The Third DCA held the disqualification motions were legally insufficient because the spouse's position involved no supervision of prosecutors and no involvement in case prosecution, adopting the reasoning of JEAC Opinion 2023-09 and distinguishing Edwards v. State and its own prior decision in Brewer v. Hughes.
Key facts
- Twelve consolidated defendants moved to disqualify a Monroe County judge based on the judge's spouse becoming Executive Director of the State Attorney's Office in a purely administrative, non-supervisory role with no involvement in case prosecution.
- The trial court denied the disqualification motions, and the defendants sought writs of prohibition in the Third District Court of Appeal.
- +1 more key fact with a free trial
Why it matters
This opinion fills a gap the court itself acknowledges — there is very little Florida case law addressing when a judge's spouse's employment at the state attorney's or public defender's office requires disqallification… — full analysis with a trial
🔒 Read the full opinion, holding & search the library
The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision are available to members. Start a free 30-day trial — no credit card.
Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.
Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.