Landis v. State
The Fourth DCA affirmed convictions for trafficking in oxymorphone, conspiracy, and unlawful use of a two-way communications device, rejecting claims that the trial court erred by disqualifying appellant's retained counsel due to a conflict from a prior consultation with the codefendant, and that the trial court committed fundamental sentencing error by hearing testimony about appellant's uncharged prior drug dealing. The court held the attorney-client relationship and resulting conflict were supported by competent evidence and survived the codefendant's death, and that testimony about background/prior criminal history did not amount to fundamental error where the sentence was within statutory limits and the court did not expressly rely on unproven conduct.
Key facts
- Appellant was convicted in trial court of trafficking in oxymorphone, conspiracy, and unlawful use of a two-way communications device alongside a codefendant.
- The trial court disqualified appellant's retained counsel after finding the attorney had a prior consultation relationship with the codefendant, creating a conflict of interest under the Rules of Professional Conduct.
- +2 more key facts with a free trial
Why it matters
This opinion reinforces the broad scope of the attorney-client relationship for conflict-of-interest disqualification purposes—mere consultation, even absent formal retention or payment, can trigger disqualification… — full analysis with a trial
🔒 Read the full opinion, holding & search the library
The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision are available to members. Start a free 30-day trial — no credit card.
Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.
Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.