← Case library
3rd DCAJune 24, 2026Dismissed⭐ Notable

Jonathan Javitt, et al. v. North Bay Village

Case No. 2025-1440

The Third DCA denied a petition for second-tier certiorari review of a circuit court appellate division's per curiam affirmance of a municipal code enforcement order. Applying the narrow second-tier standard, the court held certiorari relief was unavailable because no violation of a clearly established principle of law resulting in a miscarriage of justice was shown, and a per curiam affirmance without written opinion generally lacks precedential value warranting review.

Key facts

  • The North Bay Village Code Enforcement Division issued an order of enforcement against Jonathan and Marsha Javitt.
  • The circuit court appellate division per curiam affirmed the code enforcement order.
  • +2 more key facts with a free trial

Holdings

  • Second-tier certiorari is reserved for situations where there has been a violation of a clearly established principle of law resulting in a miscarriage of justice, and may not be used…
  • +1 more holding with a free trial

Why it matters

The opinion reaffirms the tightly cabined scope of second-tier certiorari review, emphasizing that district courts will not disturb a circuit court's per curiam affirmance absent a clearly established legal violation… — full analysis with a trial

Best value · free

Read the full opinion, holdings & search — free for 30 days

The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision — in your hands.

  • Search every tracked Florida decision in seconds
  • Save, tag & file the cases that matter into your own library
  • Read the full plain-English analysis and holdings
Start my free 30-day trial → No credit card required
👀 Take a quick tour of the site → 60 seconds · click a real case · no login

Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.

Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.