Jimenez v. State
The Second DCA granted certiorari and quashed an order denying Jimenez's Stand Your Ground motion to dismiss, holding the trial court applied an incorrect legal standard by concluding that an admission of unlawful activity (carrying a concealed firearm without a license) was automatically fatal to the immunity claim. The court held that even when a movant concedes engaging in unlawful activity, he may still be entitled to immunity if he alleges facts showing no ability to retreat or terminate the encounter before using deadly force, and that allegation triggers the right to an evidentiary hearing.
Key facts
- Jimenez was charged with a crime after carrying a concealed firearm without a license and used deadly force during an encounter.
- Jimenez filed a Stand Your Ground motion to dismiss claiming immunity, which the trial court denied solely based on his admission of unlawful firearm possession.
- +2 more key facts with a free trial
Why it matters
This decision reinforces and applies Garcia v. State's rule that a defendant's concession of unlawful activity does not, standing alone, defeat a Stand Your Ground immunity motion if the motion also alleges facts… — full analysis with a trial
🔒 Read the full opinion, holding & search the library
The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision are available to members. Start a free 30-day trial — no credit card.
Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.
Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.